What does your brain react to?
What logic drives your moves?
Rather than making a seemingly good opportunity a necessity, it is easier to deal with the lack of structural flaws and whether they are worth getting into first.
If it works well, it prevents rapid entry and allows for accurate judgement.
If overheated, it can lead to more than necessary backup and delayed entry.
Even small signals or small structural discrepancies can be felt strongly.
The incoming signal is not easily passed and is easily caught as a direct danger or an important issue.
The boundary and focus rise well, but the force to cool it slightly is weak.
Among the issues he believes are structural rearrangement, alternative exploration, and path expansion.
It is easier to extend multiple structures in parallel than to close one quickly and finish one.
While healthy is a flexible solution, in times of overheating, reviews and expansions can go on endlessly.
When you're alone, the structure and the possibility simulation come back strongly in your mind.
The best direction is insight, design, accurate forecasting, risk modeling.
In the wrong direction, the interpretation structure and risk model can be larger than it actually is.
He sees people as a coherent structure and context rather than simply an emotional object.
While it is not easy to put on weight before a relationship is formed, once it is considered meaningful, it is not taken lightly.
When good, it becomes a careful and deep relationship, and when overheated, it can be interpreted in an overly structural and risky way.
Sensing the ideal signal of the body and the system strongly, the force to immediately realise and stabilize it can be weakened.
So fear, tension, pressure, anxiety can be clustered together like a single problem signal.
The bertida may suddenly become overheated or become overweight, with the head and body becoming overweight.
While deeply immersed in the issues that seem important, the immersion is strongly bounded by boundaries and review rather than simply pushing.
Conversely, if the meaning is weak, it is not easily entered.
Overheating can keep a problem from getting too long and can keep it stuck in your head.
Memory is easier to keep as a unit of structure and meaning than simple fact.
Especially major errors, critical contradictions, hazard signals, and the moment when the structure was right and the moment when it was wrong remain long.
Structural impressions of the past can strongly interfere with current judgments.
How do you come across to others?
They may look like people who are not easily distracted, who look at the structure and have interesting possibilities, but who are just looking at the jump.
Not only are the issues that you consider important once, but also the ones that you consider important, long-standing and multi-faceted, can make you feel the intensity of the accident.
Rather than simply being defensive, it is closer to a balanced, prudent and open restructuring.
A fight is usually a strong mix of structure, risk, complexity, possibility, and defense.
Common phrases often sound like this.
This should not go too fast.
The structure is already being misguided here.
It's not a matter of closing it that simple.
We should see more of the number of cases.
Enter now and you could lose even more.
That is, rather than just having a lot of emotions, it can come out in a way that keeps the path open while attaching structure and adjusting risk.
DILWG is not a fully enclosed side for a person, but it does not carry heavy weights easily.
Rather than going deeply into the structure and stability first, which feels interesting and appropriate, it is more likely to slowly attach energy.
If only one time is considered appropriate, a way may emerge that will prolong thoughts and context rather than simply show up as a visual exchange.
Their initial interpersonal style usually looks like this.
not easily overheated
view the other structurally
the horse's density is low and the entrance is cautious
doesn't start a relationship lightly
This type of upper is where understanding problem structure and risk mitigation come first rather than emotional integration.
For example, things like this come out naturally.
It's not structurally strange that you feel it loudly now.
It's not just one problem, it's overlapping and it's hotter.
Don't just look at this as a bunch and see if we can split it.
Now it's time to make sure it doesn't get worse.
Just because the W is stuck, just to be careful, not to end up with a W.
Then let's open up another pathway. It's easy to make suggestions.
Since it takes the possibility of structural discrepancies and losses seriously into account when conflict arises,
They may respond more like a paradoxical argument than a simple argument, boundaries, problem-structure analysis, careful distance control.
And because W is stuck, it is possible to continue to find a different order path or a rearrangement path than finishing in one way.
Common patterns include:
Structurally speaking, where is the problem?
not to quickly explode emotions
inside, it is long-standing and interpreted
If one path is blocked, present another method of organization.
It is not easy to resolve a conflict once it is considered important.
The symptoms can be shown relatively slowly and carefully.
Not simply because of the carelessness, but because it is a way to first check the structure and safety of the load before loading.
It often looks like this.
observes more directly than the observer.
remembers the content and pattern of the conversation for a long time
Organizing the structure and context of the opposing horse.
if you feel right, it slightly expands the range of interaction.
is manifested by a sustained interest in and density of thought rather than direct emotion
once a relationship is opened, I don't take it lightly.
That is, it is easier to express a liking through sustained attention, careful openness, structural memory than a horse.
Humor is not a complete emotional exaggeration, but rather a way of expressing it.
Structural flaw + risk overload + number of cases can come close to expansion.
Sometimes, it is a matter of exposing the flaws of the situation, of grabbing a tiny gap in logic, or of deliberately increasing the number of cases to make a laugh.
When burnout hits, the following changes tend to show clearly.
even the smallest problem is too loud to be received
thinking and boundaries exaggerated.
what you left open turns into an endless mystery.
delaying the decision further
critical of the rescue effort is becoming sharp and harsh.
can't breathe and keeps sticking to his head and suddenly goes out
From the outside, it looks like it's a good idea.
A formerly prudent person may appear over-economical, insight may turn into over-analytic, and flexible restructuring may appear to be a late and unsuccessful decision.
But internally, the G-weighing continues to be applied to the D-L-W adjustment loop, and the weak anchors are increasing.
A healthy DILWG usually looks like this.
not easily swept away -
There is a sense of structure
He sees the risk quickly -
not take the important things lightly
flexible alternatives to the design of the system.
a lot of accidents, even though they seem silent.
Analysis leads to actual adjustment and restructuring.
That is, not cowardly people.
They are likely to see the risk, take the structure, rearrange the possibilities and actually appear to be a better path forward.
How close can you get to each type?
31 / 31 types shown